CARE FOR KIDS IS YOUR VOTE AVAILABLE?
Aussie Friends of Treehorn
encouraging adults to think sensitively, to care for kids, to make wise choices….with their hearts in gear, their pens active and their votes available .
NAPLAN has nothing to do with learning. It has nothing to do with teaching. It has nothing to do with real schooling. It has to do with finding fault and making money. It’s an ineffective, unreliable and invalid device that makes the most of young children’s vulnerability and it deliberately threatens their emotional and cognitive development.
NAPLAN and Political Parties
The ALP played its cards first. Bad move, Bill. Your statements showed your party’s enormous disregard for what goes on in Australian schools. You didn’t mention NAPLAN at all…don’t give a fig? [Did ACARA prepare your paper?]
Your twin neo-con party, the Liberals, followed the Gillard line and all that it has to say about NAPLAN is that the results should be returned to schools within 12 weeks, instead of the present four or five months….as if they were of some use.
The Greens are usually much more realistic, even though they don’t dare to make esoteric statements They like starting inquiries so that the esoters can fight each other and schooling never gets anywhere. Their only comment on NAPLAN is that the tests should be conducted at the start of the year. Quite profound for a party that stands a real chance.
If an Independent says that he or she will get rid of NAPLAN, he or she is on a winner. No doubt. They’ll get a job. Mums and dads will make sure.
So……. if the parents of this great [Education] country want some betterment to the system […since NAPLAN controls it], we must
Ignore the effects of NAPLAN on schooling [ALP]
Run the tests at the beginning of the year. [Green]
Get the [useless] results back within 12 weeks. [LNP]
That’s school improvement 2016 style!!
That’s real thinking about how well our kids are treated at school!!
That’s what happens when politics rules a schooling system!!!
Quality teachers will agree with the definition of a test score as provided by Professor John Settledge:
A NAPLAN result is an inadequate judgement by a biased and variable data-miner, of the extent to which an undefined level of mastery of unknown proportions of an inadequate amount of material has been completed on time. It is operated by a New Mafia, more engrossed in the accumulation of dollars and cents than in concern for child welfare and progress. Its Frankenstein outcomes, the creation of a monster that destroys everything around it, has no boundaries within the curriculum.
It is the product of a cane-toad ‘intellectual’ persuasion, Just as scientists were told that some Hawaiian toads ate beetles, without reference to any other sidelights [such as how high they could jump or how high beetles could fly or what else toads ate.], NAPLAN was introduced because some bankers thought that fear was the best way to make young children learn. No further thought. Politicians then took over.
Now. Our kids need help. Politicians can get rid of the menace. Ironic, isn’t it?
Let’s see how fair dinkum they are when they talk about kids and NAPLAN during the electioneering.