The Greatest Fight of Our Lives

by Peggy Robertson

Reposted from Peg with Pen

Read about the struggle against GERM in the USA. Their battle is very intense and very important to Australia and New Zealand. What happens in USA finds its way down under. International collegiality in the anti-GERM campaign is vital.

“Be wide awake. And be prepared for the greatest fight of our lives.”

Allan

——-

The Greatest Fight of Our Lives

The admissions of error, the requests for moratoriums, the recognition that perhaps testing has gone too far, are running like wildfire in the last few weeks.

 We have Randi calling for a moratorium.

Bill Gates admitting that maybe testing tied to teacher evaluation is out of control.

Arne wants us to recognize testing mistakes as learning opportunities. 

And they attempt to appease the public by finding testing companies who can do it better.

They continue to push messages that keep the public from remembering that teachers know how to assess – teachers assessing is NOT an option in this brave new world.  Our knowledge must become obsolete in order to profit off of public education. Our knowledge of teaching and learning – our knowledge of how to support learners in becoming more than a test score – must be erased – they do not want students who are more than a test score – this defeats their goal in the global economy where we will serve them.

We need to be clear that any concessions, any admissions of error, any offer to give us time away from those horrid high stakes tests at this moment are simply a ploy to encourage us to sleep away the next few months while they prepare to launch the PARCC and SBAC for our children and anchor the common core into the heart of public education, there by destroying it, along with our teaching profession, our children’s privacy and our democracy. Be very awake.

It is May 2013. PARCC and SBAC testing will be rolled out in the upcoming school year, 2013-2014. Our window of opportunity to stop this train from starting is short and must be aggressive and fearless.

The goal right now is to appease us so that we believe we are making headway and believe that they hear our voices and care.  They do not care.

What is most frightening at this very critical time is the mass of educators who have been swayed to believe they do care. They have been swayed to believe that the intentions with common core are well meaning. I believe we have made some headway in educating the public about the harms of high stakes testing, but we have not made it clear that the common corestandards, curriculum and assessments that come with them will destroy our public school system, our profession, our children’s future and our democracy.

Those of us who work in public schools today find ourselves in  a dark cave – NCLB has stripped away all windows, all light, all sparks that ignite the fire in a child’s soul.  RTTT has come forward to take what is left – the shell of learning and teaching – and recreate it into a form or being that I do not recognize as human or alive – it is death. What we have been left with in the public schools has no heart beat, no warmth, no breath of life.

Those of us who are in the public schools and know what they are trying to force upon us are desperately blowing on the spark, rubbing together the sticks, and attempting to keep learning alive. Because there are many of us in our schools doing this, we are momentarily able to survive and protect the children as best we can under these harsh conditions.

But not for long.

The PARCC and SBAC come next fall. I am frightened for the children – the onslaught of common core lock step scripted curriculum will step forward to embrace the PARCC and SBAC; the slow death of public education will speed forward quickly. The attempt to silence teachers next year will be greater, more intimidating and more punishing than we have ever seen.

The attempt to force us to accept our fate under the guidance of the common core, the mission of the World Bank, the billionaire boys’ club, and RTTT policies will be rolled out in various ways.  They will stifle us with mandates, but then will allow us up for air as they admit mistakes on this exciting journey of learning where we find our way - together. They will send us babbling into arguments about the pros and cons of poorly written test questions, better tests, refined tests, creative online tests, better common core curriculum created by teachers and better technology for testing. They will engage us in discussions as they admit their “bumps” along the way on our new found path; they will try to take our hand and walk with us ascollaborators. They will grant us the grace and time to become more as we embrace the common core standards – during which, we will be contending with teacher evaluation, new legislation and new tasks surrounding creation of common core curriculum in our individual districts. They will keep all of us very busy putting out fires.

There will be more petitions, moratoriums, proclamations, opportunities to offer feedback – and it will all be pointless. Do not engage in this. We must each look at our individual source of energy and use it wisely and in a manner that creates action to dismantle their system.

While all of this is going on, our children will be sitting in classrooms unaware that they are being treated as lab rats. They will look at their teachers with trust in their eyes. The teachers who understand what is happening – who know common core has not been field tested, is developmentally inappropriate and is the cash cow to seal the deal on the privatization of public schools and destruction of the teaching profession -  will do all that they can to treat their students in this experiment with compassion and kindness, attempting to keep them from harm; however, it will not be enough. The teachers who know not what they do, will subject children to great harm, as is already occurring.

The time is now to prepare. As those of us teaching finish up the year, please know that this summer requires serious planning. Parents please know that educating our communities must be the absolute focus of our work this summer. We must launch the 2013-2014 school year with plans to educate, act, and halt the harm done to our children – and we must focus our work with intent – do not be swayed by any form of action that does not end in concrete results that you can see – these results must disrupt or halt their work. They will attempt to exhaust us by creating false opportunities to act – do not engage in any of these – I cannot stress this enough – we have already wasted precious time doing this.

United Opt Out National is in the process of creating an opt out guide tailored to the specific needs of each state, as well as a guide for early childhood education, and special/exceptional education. However, a guide is worthless unless it is acted upon – we must act. Refusing what they offer us is the quickest way to halt their progress.  

We must refuse the assessments and the common core in all shapes and forms.

Parents – you are essential in this fight. Teachers will refuse as best they can, but the parents can lead the way.

They know we are making progress and they are planning strategies to halt our progress now. They will cash in on public education at all costs –  including our children – they do not care about our children. Their children are fine, and they (corp.ed.reformers) have no ability to see, hear or feel what we know – they are not in our schools, and quite honestly, if they do come to our schools, they will not be able to see what we see – they view the world using a business model.  Our work as educators involves heart. It involves soul. We help shape the lives of children, today and tomorrow. It is messy, it is unpredictable and it is impossible to place in a standardized box.

They protect each other and their world. Their heart is simply incapable of understanding our heart. Call it evil. Call it fact. Call it ignorance. Make sense of it however you must, but know that attempting to get those who profit off this madness to understand is futile during these urgent times. Do not waste your time. Look to those who do understand and act. There is very little time left. There is no time to hope for a change of heart.

Their goal is to educate our children so that they are ready for their low level entry jobs – they will save the higher positions for their children. They plan to privatize public education so that what is left is the basics (simply read, write, regurgitate their information), with public tax dollars funneled to profit them while making the public believe that “innovation” is occurring via online learning and assessments that claim to assess higher level thinking.

Those of us who know what is going on will find more constraints placed on us wherever we turn. They will attempt to accuse us of wrong-doings (specifically teachers involved in activism), humiliate us and force us into submission. They will try to make us go away. Be prepared to discover that there are some whom you may have trusted, who will begin to walk a careful line between their world and our world, or simply turn their backs on us.

Be wide awake. And be prepared for the greatest fight of our lives.

Letter to withdraw your child from NAPLAN

Reposted from Boycott Naplan Coalition

 

Letter to withdraw your child from NAPLAN

 

 For your information as a parent:

Since you are the legal guardian of your child, you can state that you don’t want your child to be tested, just as you can state you don’t want your child to go swimming or to participate in any other event. You do not have to give a reason. Below is a form letter you can use.

——-

Dear Teacher and Principal,

I have discussed NAPLAN with my child and I have decided that he/she will not be doing the NAPLAN test. I have decided to exercise my legal right as guardian.

I am very concerned about the negative impact of NAPLAN testing on our education system and have no interest in creating any unnecessary anxiety for my daughter/son; especially when NAPLAN serves no learning purpose.

While I realise that I am under no obligation to present any reasons for my child’s withdrawal, I do think that it is worth explaining. I know that you both, as teacher and principal, have the best interest of my daughter/son in mind – that is not in question. NAPLAN testing, however, does not improve learning nor does it provide any meaningful data for teachers. (See www.boycottliteracy.net orwww.literacyeducators.com.au/naplan.)  Instead, NAPLAN results are being used by government to force schools into competing for students and resources. As a result, NAPLAN testing is narrowing the curriculum, and is often leading to a lot of test practice rather than productive learning in classrooms.

I  sincerely hope that parents, teachers and principals can come together on this issue and reject NAPLAN.

As the parent (or legal guardian) of the following children, I request that they are withdrawn from all NAPLAN testing.

Name of child               Year level

……………………………………   ……………..

……………………………………   ……………..

Yours sincerely,

……………………………………..
(parent / guardian)

……………………………………..

Indignez Vous

The Treehorn Express

Prepared and presented by Phil Cullen,

proud anti-NAPLAN geriactivist thinking of kids.

  __________Hi EsteemedPolitician : Quiet lot aren’t you?________

__________________________________________________________________-

Treehorn story? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

The Treehorn Express Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

April 25

175

bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanban

Indignez Vous

“Time for Outrage”

This week’s Time mentions a popular French pamphlet called Indignez Vous [Time for Outrage] which exhorts folk to recapture the spirit that had made their country great; to mount a “peaceful insurrection” against injustices and decries the electorate’s convenient and ”general amnesia”. The theme of the booklet reminded me so much of the injustices against the likes of little Treehorn and his school friends; and the need for an Australian “peaceful insurrection”.  The convenient memories of our school children’s parents, teachers, principals, political representatives and their numb-mind silence on an issue of such national importance is disgraceful….and… The lamestream press is too busy with the easily handled. Most, really, just do not give a stuff about the assaults on our children’s future perpetrated by NAPLAN and other GERM forms of blanket testing. As rude as it sounds, let me repeat…Most of us do not give a stuff about the future of Australian children. 

But.  Take heart, Treehorn. There are others. Anti-Germ educators are starting to say something here in Australia and in the U.S.A. There is small group of child-oriented, learning-knowledgeable, teaching-focussed, curriculum-concerned, family-friendly folk in Melbourne who want to ask the Australian population to “SAY NO TO NAPLAN”. Let’s join them.

If one is concerned about their own children and whether they should contest the test,

or if one does not know what to do in the face of pandemic mindlessness,

or if one wonders if the test has any relevance to learning and teaching;

or whether the test is a reliable measure of achievement that can be used to make statements about the academic worth of their children or the teaching prowess of their child’s teacher,

….they should check out what the group has to say.

SAY ‘NO’ TO NAPLAN

If the population takes notice with an open mind, NAPLAN is finished… and Australia will start to progress in achievement terms, creative terms and cultural terms. There is no risk about this.  If the cessation of testing is accompanied by  some Finland-like planning, with an even  higher-level long-term vision, the world becomes an Aussie oyster. Make no mistake! We have made enough colossal blunders since 2008. Let’s think about positive blame-free progress.

On Tuesday next in Melbourne, teachers, parents and academics will foregather to launch “SAY NO TO NAPLAN”. A special small book is the focus of the launch containing articles that deal with :

* Inappropriate Use of NAPLAN tests.

*Teaching to the Test.

*Holistic Reading vs NAPLAN Reading

*The Problem with NAPLAN testing of Spelling

*Your Children and NAPLAN

*What NAPLAN ignores

*The Age of Absurdity

*Evidence-based Assessment

Each article is short and easy to read. It will be made available online for downloading and copy.  It can be easily spread amongst teachers, parents, university, high-school  and university students for their deliberation. The lead-article will be presented by Professor Margaret Wu. There has been a keen interest expressed by journalists from the  press. It will be a most important day in the history of Australian schooling, the first of peaceful insurrection and the beginning of the end of fear-based NAPLAN testing.

More details to come.

0o0o0o0o0

THE BEGINNING OF THE END

Meanwhile back in New York, the birthplace of fear-driven schooling and testing, conspicuous educators are also restless. The New York State Professors Against High Stakes Testing have released an on-line petition [see Treehorn 17-04-12], because “...it undermines creative classrooms instruction and because it puts teachers and students under intolerable stress.”  You can join the people to help New York children and our own, by doing this…

1. Click  on    http://www.change.org/petitions/new-york-state-regents-end-the-reliance-on-high-stakes-standardized-testing

2. Make a comment.

3. Follow the suggestions to contact your Facebook friends who might be interested in schooling issues.

{I did this and was overjoyed to learn than every single one of my Facebook friends also joined the petition. It is a great feeling.}

The anti-GERM movement is growing and sharing. We are all starting to ‘care for kids’ while hopeless politicians will not. It’s the beginning of the end for GERM-based testing in many countries. Let’s hope that Australia gets the gold in the contest.

GETTING RID OF HIGH_STAKES TESTS

Stop! The News Gets Better.  On Tuesday [24 April] Valerie Strauss wrote in The Washington Post of the growth of anti-high-stakes aka anti-Germ aka anti-NAPLAN movements in America:

National resolution against high-stakes tests

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/national-resolution-against-high-stakes-tests-released/2012/04/23/gIQApRnNdT_blog.html

Within the article make sure that you click on the reference ‘latest in series of recent initiatives taken’ and you will find : Education reform protests pick up steam.  Both are great articles.

PLEASE READ THEM AND EVERY REFERENCE WITHIN  – You can even frame the National Resolutions for your own encouragement. Share the articles around. They are so full of promise for our children’s learning freedom. 71 national organisations have signed the resolution mentioned in the article. See http://www.timeoutfromtesting.org./nationalresolution/orgs

Pam Grundy of Parents Across America says: “Parents are fed up with constant testing. We want our elected leaders to support real learning not constant testing.”

Robert Scott, Republican Commissioner for Education : “The mentality that standardized testing is the ‘end-all and be-all’ is a perversion of what quality education should be.” [Joe Brown, Governor of California said the same thing last year.]

A New York school official: “A Principal should not ever be in a situation where ultimately their judgment gets trumped by a mechanistic formula.”

The articles are enlightening. Is there a Valerie Strauss somewhere in Australia?

o0o0o0o0o

Trevor Cobbold of Save Our Schools asks 16 poignant questions in What is NAPLAN Doing to Your School?  They will intrigue you. For example

5. Does absenteeism increase on test days?  7. Are some subjects missing out from increased times spent on NAPLAN? Which subjects?  13. Has the public reporting of NAPLAN results affected the ability to attract and retain experienced teachers?  16. Do schools inform parents they can withdraw their children from NAPLAN?

No.16 is NOT a trick question. See  http://www.saveourschools.com.au

_____________________________________________________________________________

Allan Alach, the world’s most avid reader of books and articles about schooling, supplied  yesterday’s article by Valerie Strauss and almost every article that has appeared on Treehorn. We have begun to exchange casual letters, much in the way Diane Ravitch and Deborah Meier exchange, but with a down-under, antipodean flavour and style. Allan, the guardian of http://treehornexpress.wordpress.com, has listed the first one in the side-band and head-band of the website. It’s my letter to him that was intended to say thanks for his amazing efforts. The new column has been called Bridging the Ditch and it is appropriate that we first mention it on 25 April – Anzac Day. They’ll come in random order at any time. Join us if you wish.

OtherTreehorns ? :   Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Maintained by outstanding NZ educator, Allan Alach

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

Naplan Confusions

The Treehorn Express

Prepared and presented by Phil Cullen, proud anti-NAPLAN geriactivist thinking of kids.

__________________________________________________________________

Treehorn story? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

The Treehorn Express Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

April 17

171

If NAPLAN was in a lost property box, who would dare claim it as their intellectual property?

bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannanplanbannaplanbanlaplanbannaplanb annaplan bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplan

Naplan Confusions

1. There are aspects of the administration of NAPLAN that one has to query…

Why is it that there is no public notice to tell parents that their children do NOT have to take the NAPLAN test?   Why don’t school principals tell parents on their websites?

The tests will be held in a few weeks and few members of the public know that they are not compulsory. Why the secrecy?

Then, why do Departmental officials tell blatant lies to parents… “Participation in the NAPLAN tests is mandatory for all children …”  http://www.education.qld.gov.au/parents/home-education/other-info.html

Surely such confusion places the credibility of the administration of NAPLAN in serious doubt.

When state department officials do not know the rules, there has to be a problem.

And doesn’t it feel strange that the public press has so little to say about NAPLAN.  [Wait for results and it will.]

????????????????????????????????????????????

2.  In terms of financial accountability at the federal and state levels,  a search for prunings of public activity that do little for the public good is being undertaken. Strange things happen, and there is speculation that little has been recommended in education terms because the PM actually believes that New York’s Mr. Klein knew what he was  talking about; and her blind devotion is respected, albeit feared,  by state ministers. There has been little mention of NAPLAN as a source of immense saving. It is useless, unnecessary, damaging to our future, stressful for children, unprofessional, unethical and its demise would save millions of dollars. Why isn’t it, scaredy-cats?

o0o0o0o

NEW YORK [The source of NAPLAN]

Meanwhile, back at the ranch  where all the high-stakes, fear-driven testing adamant was first entrenched, thanks to Messrs Klein and Murdoch, a group called New York State Professors Against High Stakes Testing has released an on-line petition to stop the damage that the tests are doing….”both because it undermines creative classroom instruction and because it puts teachers and students under intolerable stress.”  The alliance of Professors want to extend the alliance and share“….common cause with public school teachers and principals, who are trying to protect their profession from being undermined by management systems which disregard their traditions and best practices.”

http://www.change.org/petitions/new-york-state-regents-end-the-reliance-on-high-stakes-standardized-testing

bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanban

________________________________________________________________________

OtherTreehorns ? :   Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Maintained by outstanding NZ educator, Allan Alach

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

A Tragi-Comedy

The Treehorn Express

Prepared and presented by Phil Cullen, anti-NAPLAN geriactivist.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Treehorn story? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

The Treehorn Express Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

April 9

168

NAPLAN – A Tragi-Comedy

There were some comical reactions to the advertisement for sharp pencils in preparation for the forthcoming NAPLAN  blanket testing.  See previous Treehorn Express

Principal Ron of S.A. opened with, “In the Theatre of the Absurd, NAPLAN has to be top of the charts in the list of tragi-comedies. ‘ Pencils Ready!’ will be the name of the opening scene.”

Assoc. Professor Morna of Townson Uni., USA says, “This is so friggin great, Phil.” and finishes her email with “All power to the imagination’. “

Past-Principal Fred of Q’ld says, “ I believe that NAPLAN improves learning and teaching by making us talk about results. I also believe that the potatoes that we rub on our warts should be buried in the back-yard to a depth according to our age:- One inch [Yes. Inch] according to decades completed. Mine [67 yrs]. will be 6 inches deep.”

Teacher Mary of Amsterdam, Holland sent the advertisement with a twinkle in her eye; and recommended reading http://truth-out.org/news/item/8305-the-assault-on-public-education

o00o0o0o0o0o0o

One has to feel at times that the whole business of testing kids in a Bingo-like atmosphere and making profound judgements about the results is nothing but a great big, sick  political joke. We’ve been HAD. H..A..D.. HAD.

Our  blind addiction to the American Marx Brothers of Education is a joke.  It will go away. It has to.  It’s too sick; too tragic.

“Just got back from the USA. I will discus my ideas with you…and the important issues with major stakeholders.” 

o0o0o0o0o0o

Who provided the idea? Harpo ? Chicko? Groucho?

NAPLAN – The National Laxative

banvambannaplanbanbannaplanbanvambannaplanbanvamnaplanbanvamnaplanbanvambannaplanbanvambannaplan

P.L.Thomas suggests that the GERM movement in the U.S.  is the embodiment of might-makes-right [as the above cartoons illustrate]. In his short article he says: “While it appears we cringe when children bully each other, we have no qualms about inexpert, inexperienced, and self proclaimers bullying an entire profession.”

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/05/1080584/-The-Bully-Politics-of-Education-Reform

o0o

 ‘Disgusted with standardized tests, group of parents shunning them’ – The Seattle Times:

They’ll be in another room, doing art or science projects….”We are a state that does testing on steroids,”says Angela Cohen [President of the parent-teacher organization]. “I came to the conclusion that we could find better ways to spend that money.”   It all began with good intentions. …The tests are used to judge whether entire schools should be considered failing….They weren’t designed as learning aids for individual kids.” …..a  rebellion it has become. One that echoes a larger uprising around the country.

 http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2017902194_danny04.html 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

OtherTreehorns ? :   Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Maintained by outstanding NZ educator, Allan Alach

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

Joel, Condaleezza and others.

 The Treehorn Express

Treehorn story? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

The Treehorn Express Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

 CURRENT NEWS   

Joel, Condoleezza and others report

In April 2011, Joel Klein and Condoleezza Rice were appointed to head a group ‘evaluating the U.S.public education system within the context of national security.’ This report on kids at school presently being test-cooked to be cannon fodder [and corporate zombies] will be released next week. The Washington Post of Wednesday, March 14 anticipates its conclusions…

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/14-0

Why OECD ? Why PISA?

Allan Alach, who sends most of the articles mentioned below, asks some poignant questions after reading this article about the determination of Wales to get in the top twenty scoring of PISA tests.

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/education-news/2012/03/15/first-minister-carwyn-jones-predicts-wales-will-make-world-schools-top-20-91466-30537499/

Allan asks: “Isn’t there something paradoxical here? If every country aims to move up the PISA league tables, and succeeds, what happens?  Surely, if all countries are moving up, nothing will change? Also, correct me if I’m wrong here, but with the exception of the Finlands and the like, all the countries who want to move up the ladder are doing the same thing – standards testing, accountability, performance pay and so on. What is the magic difference that moves Wales [or others] up the ladder, given that the prescription is the same all over? Will their testing/teaching system be better than NAPLAN, for example? What else could make a difference.?

It doesn’t make sense to me. If moving up the ladder is so important, why not learn from those at the top?

And, a question that I’ve raised before – how come PISA results have become the be-all and end-all of education? Why do we let the OECD dictate what ‘good education’ is?”

Ouch. Such a comment must hurt those who are possessed by their ranking in the PISA tests; and by those who believe that blanket testing helps children learn. That was a real jab to the short rib, Allan, for the measure-mad.  Remember – Finland does not believe in blanket testing and only entered the PISA contest just for fun.

Since then, PISA has possessed all countries that have little regard for children. What use is it? Great point. Thanks. And yes, what does the OECD know about teaching/learning techniques that we don’t?

Sites to Behold

Kelvin Smythe, outstanding New Zealand educator of http://www.networkonnet.co.nz/ has recently commented on [1] ‘National Standards [aka NAPLAN In Australia] is about self-managing schools.’ In this article he speaks of Joce Jesson, a senior research fellow, developing a carefully constructed argument building to a powerful conclusion. [2] A book called I’ve Got Something to Say by Gail Loane and Sally Muir. One of Kelvin’s readers wrote :’I totally endorse the review – this is one of the best teaching resources I have seen in years. It puts writing into a context in which it can be REAL and alive – for teachers and most certainly for children.’ {3] some advice to Mr. Shearer, leader of the N.Z. Labour Party.

For access to these articles, click on ‘LATEST’ to the left of the site.  Very worthy material.

Tony Gurr at http://allthingslearning.wordpress.com provides an excellent launching pad for so much advice on so many issues and learnings, that one can spend a very happy day, surfing from his place.

His latest are [1] ‘Herding cats’ and change (Part 2) ; [2] The Mother of all curriculum ‘Myths’; [3] In Praise of Creativity (Part One}. Tony’s graphics are splendid….the little girl on the pottie getting ready for the IT revolution in the ‘Care for Kids’ theme song above is one of his.

Random Comments from Readers

Les Treichel one of Australia’s most experienced true-blue schoolies, now part-time retired, ghosts an address from a concerned Principal to parents, teachers and students of his school that illustrates the present-day spirit of NAPLAN. THE NAPLAN SCHOOL OF THOUGHT; LES TREICHEL

Ken W. Toowoomba Home-Schoolers : We were talking to a manual-arts teacher today. He and his [teacher] wife are considering homeschooling their family. He believes that the Nat Curric is just a forerunner to teachers being given supervisory roles while students use computers to complete centrally administrated tasks [possibly in cubicles with little flags they can push up and down for assistance]. See. Those fundi schools [Ken refers to the  of American ACE kind of schools, one of which was run by Rona Joyner] of the 70’s were pointers to the future! 

John H. former Primary Principal and School Inspector of Koala Beach : In today’s SMH there is a piece by Dr. William McKeith on cameras in the classroom. Hong Kong seems to be the leader in this practice where parents and administrators view what is going on in the classroom. Maybe we could run a book on when this will appear in Australia. Julia and co. could see what is going on in the classroom at Upper Scrubby Creek. Surveillance cameras are a way of life on the streets of the UK, but would you have liked one when you were at Baking Board?

{Answer. No John. I don’t think so. Baking Board, by the way, was a fettlers’ siding – 37 kids in six grades, a Scholarship candidate or two every year – long desks and forms. My successor left to become a Jesuit priest; and then Lyle Schuntner – later QTU and QTCU President and Liberal MP, straightened out the place.}

John S-S upon reading of the appalling treatment of some outstanding Brooklyn teachers who were pilloried because of their pupils’ test scores, said

“The story of those wonderful teachers’ heroic achievements in their schools being denigrated with contempt because they fell between the cracks of the testing regime’s flawed ‘measurement’ criteria is the kind of horror story which should cause Australian education leaders to change their policy – immediately.

I would also remind you of the wonderful critique of ‘high stakes testing’ offered with such warmth and good humour by Pasi Sahlberg, the Finnish Education analyst who recently visited Australia.”

Richard Waters of the School of Total Education, Warwick, sent the following newsletter to all parents at the school.

GETTING THE BALANCE RIGHT

I was talking to some friends recently who had returned from a couple of years working in New York and they were saying that the pressure on kids there is incredible.

The New York system, set up by lawyer Joel L. Klein, so impressed our Prime Minister that she modelled much of Australian’s current education policy on it. This includes the high stakes NAPLAN testing and the publication of schools results on the MySchool website.

Because of Queensland’s relatively poor performance on the NAPLAN test, there has been a lot of pressure on teachers. In some schools, certain students are asked to stay home on test day so as not to bring the results down.

The Prime Minister is also concerned about our apparent slip in performance from 4th to 7th place in relation to other OECD countries, especially since some of our Asian trading partners have passed us.

Ironically, Pasi Sahlberg, Director of Education in Finland, which has been at the top of the OECD rankings for many years, is critical of the way Australia uses its NAPLAN tests and MySchool Website. Speaking on the 7.30 Report on ABC TV last week he commented: “Anywhere these types of things have been put in place, teachers have started to focus more on teaching to the test and the curriculum is narrowed….” 

Sahlberg said, “We believe that co-operation and networking and sharing are the important things to make sure everybody will improve…”

It is important to get the balance right between helping children achieve good literacy and numeracy standards and putting too much pressure on them.

Education is about producing good citizens and helping children to gain confidence in their ability to learn. Is high stakes testing really the way to achieve those outcomes?

Treehorn: The Child’s Representative  Attached is a short article that I have submitted to a local [Tweed Heads] church bulletin.

TREEHORN – children’s representative

Have you found it difficult to emphasize the threat to Australia’s children and the country’s well-being to fine people who haven’t given a thought to kids-at-school for years?  I’ve tried in this article. I’m supposing that almost all are interested but not concerned about NAPLAN and its effects on classroom operations. None with whom I have discussed the issue, has had a view of how to handle the coming high-tech classroom revolution; although one businessman told me that, when he was handing out prizes to nine Year 9 pupils at his local high school, he asked each what s/he thought of computers in classrooms. He was surprised that each one told him that they were boring.  I also get the impression that the public’s view of teaching as a profession is sinking, which must sadden all of us deeply….if it’s true.

Readings for Busy People

IS THE TEACHING PROFESSION DEAD? Shaun Johnson suggest : “Teaching as a respected profession has been on life support for quite some time. Currently so-called reformers appear poised to finally pull the plug once and for all. Teaching is and should ideally viewed as an intellectual profession….

I’m pretty close to admitting that it is indeed dead, or at the very least so deprived of intellectual and professional vigor that it cannot possibly recover. Teaching is now closer to a vocation than a profession; a teacher is what Said calls the ‘friendly technician’. I’m disappointed. I mean: I don’t have a problem with vocations per se. But education, man, I expected something a bit more from them.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shaun-johnson

RAISE TEACHER STATUS TO IMPROVE SCHOOLS, SAYS OECD On Wednesday, 14 March [Current News] Sean Coughlin reported on BBC News that a recently released OECD report suggests that a modern economy needs teachers who are able to support the learning of children in a digital age. “People are not attracted by schools organised like an assembly line, with teachers working as interchangeable widgets in a bureaucratic command-and-control environment….At present, teachers across the industrialised world are not receiving levels of pay that reflect their importance, says the report.”

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-17357646

THE MIND OF KIDS  On Saturday, 10 March [Current News] Lisa Cooley wrote: “Kids have an interconnectivity today that we could never have dreamed about…Kids know that the promise of jobs and prosperity that we make to them as a return for knuckling down and getting to work is a myth. [If they don’t know it, if they believe in that prosperity, then we are guilty of lying, aren’t we?]

A lot of kids simply don’t believe the institution cares a fig for them. I should say, some kids have a funny feeling that their needs don’t matter….others know it for sure.

It matters so much that adults will devote time and attention to finding out who these kids are, what they enjoy, what they love, and what they most want to do, and learn, and be.”

http://mindsofkids.blogspot.co.nz/2012/03/yes-i-really-mean-it.html

PARENTS PULL CHILDREN OUT OF NAPLAN TESTS TO AVOID MySchool RANKING  A parent at Korowal School, a small private school at Hazelbrook in the Blue Mountains, one of 23 who withdrew their children from NAPLAN blanket testing,  said, “Parents at our school are very aware that the use of results from such small groups to rank schools on the MySchool website is as valid as pulling a random number out of a hat and the result could damage the school’s reputation unfairly.” That made Mr. Picolli, NSW Minister for Education, get his knickers in a twist. The Sydney Morning herald reported “ Mr Piccoli said yesterday that he held a ‘dim view’ of anecdotal reports of ‘schools holding children from the tests.’”  “If I get any confirmed cases, I will be taking action on it.” Mr. Piccoli said. “It’s not appropriate. The tests are supposed to be for the benefit of the student.”

I wonder who sold him that myth.  I wonder what he did to punish concerned and thinking parents of the Korowal kind. It happened last May.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/parents-pull-children-out-of-naplan-tests-to-avoid-my-school-ranking-20110510-1ehc6.html

TESTING BACKLASH School Districts in these Texas counties have adopted a resolution decrying an over-reliance on standardized high-stakes testing. This report in the Houston Chronicle says: “For years, murmurs of discontent have stirred among teachers tired of devoting class time to test preparation, school administrators saddled by legislative mandates, parents anxious about the increasing focus on high-stakes assessments….At least 40 school boards have taken a stand by passing a resolution decrying the ‘over reliance on standardized, high stakes testing’ that is ‘strangling our public schools,’  The testing culture has become ”the heart of the vampire.” As many as 45 days of the school year are interrupted by tests and third-graders are required to take four-hour-long, high-stakes tests. Superintendent Sconzo said: “It’s a single-moment-in-time assessment that does not come close to measuring all the students are expected to learn.”   “What began as a way to measure student learning…has ballooned into a ‘drill-and-kill’ cycle of test preparation.”

“Administrators stress they are not against accountability, but against a system they say leaves no room to teach critical thinking and simply produces good test-takers.”

http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Schol-officials-High-Stakes-tests-failing-3398501.php

banvamnaplanbanvamnaplanbanvamnaplanbanvamnaplanbanvamnaplan

Surely we have to wonder how Australia ever allowed the NAPLAN pestilence to infest our learning space.

banvamnaplanbanvamlaplanbanvamnaplanbanvamnaplan

If you have 4 minutes 17 seconds to spare from your busy schedule, click on the theme song “Care for Kids” above, relax and ‘take in’ the words. Meditate on the plight of today’s generation of Aussie kids.

OtherTreehorns ? :   Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Maintained by outstanding NZ educator, Allan Alach

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

Home Schooling

 The Treehorn Express

Treehorn story? http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

The Treehorn Express Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

Home  Schooling

During February, the media reported that there had been an enormous increase in the number of parents who prefer home schooling for their children,  despite its enormous demands on time, home resources and energy. Ken and Suesie Woolford, home-schoolers from Toowoomba the base for an extensive and lively net-work of home-schoolers, tell The Treehorn Express that the major reason for the startling growth is that more and more Mums and Dads, whose ‘bete noire’ is the Australian Klein System of Schooling, want their children to develop, seamlessly,  a wider range of skills and literacies required for the modern world than schools provide. At this time of the year, schools around Australia are concentrating on passing blanket, standardised tests. It ‘possesses’ Australian schooling. Homeschoolers are ‘possessed’ by their children.

Many Mums and Dads, it appears, dislike the assembly-line styles of learning of one-size-fits-all, using  hyper-prescriptive curriculum directives that might, only by chance, suit the plans of experienced teachers. Learning for home-schooled children continues smoothly through the year without the terrors of the month of May.

Those whose life experiences have embedded primary schooling per se into their DNA, as I have, must feel saddened that some parents do not find their neighbourhood school attractive enough for them to enrol their children. I love primary schooling with a passion; and to see what is happening to it, when there were so many glorious, effective and efficient options available within it, hurts like hell. I can’t describe how much it hurts. To have seen so many classrooms sparkle with the joy of learning for its own sake and now experience the sad vision of fear based schooling, supported by both sides of politics just because of their attachment to big business, is gross.

Schooling should be so learning-attractive that no parent would be able to resist enrolment. Home schooling, in this day and age, as an alternative to NAPLAN-based fear-driven-schooling, is worthy of serious support. Other parents, also increasing in number, choose to opt-out from the tests on the school location. Both sets of parents need as much support as do those who conform. It is difficult for governments to provide for these three styles of pupilling. They created the three modes. They are stuck with it; conscious, hopefully, that each child needs an equal fair go

In my time as a state department administrator, I can only recall one case of home schooling in the greater Brisbane area during those thirteen years. Of course there must have been a larger number around the state, but I guesstimate that there were no more than twenty instances during the entire 1980s. There was no blanket testing regime to ‘opt-out-of ‘ or to turn people away from regular schooling, of course.

The 1980s held promise, I’d suggest. There were many problems and the times were not perfect for the compulsory schooling of children, but teachers were getting there. The promotion of Learnacy, the desire to learn how to learn with confidence – while it was not called by that name – was on its way. There were schools where children did not like the mid-summer vacation because they were away from school for too long; where they loved to be in the classroom for as long as they could because of  the learning challenges there [and the computer era had not arrived]; where they shared their achievements with those they respected and, encouraged by their successes, aimed for the moon; where teachers shared their teaching secrets with each other; and were encouraged in their efforts by their parents and superiors.

It looked pretty clear at the time that, by the new century, Australia would have the greatest schooling system in the world. Folk from other countries were coming in increasing numbers to admire the efforts and they transported the ideas to their own. States proudly shared their better ideas with each other and around the globe. Although educational progress is always slow,  local schooling stalwarts were patient. Australia was certainly on a roll in the ‘80s and the year 2000 became a target year, full of promise.

Then…..managerialism became the catch cry. 1990 was a key year for the collapse of meaningful schooling. How such a kitsch organisational concept ever gained any kind of reputation as a panacea for improvement of a learning institution, remains a mystery. It’s effects still last. The capricious belief that people who are smart, as adjudged by any kind of  academic success, can run any kind of institution,  persists.  This belief led to the demise of one Australian state government and, if it persists, will lead to others. No government yet has thought of a reform agenda that starts its dialogue from a classroom of learnacy and considered its role as a focal point for a state structure.

Back to home schooling. Why it is enjoying such a dramatic rising popularity is explained above. Former principal, Ken Woolford, now an ardent home schooler also has this to say…

”The parents I work with – and have been working with for almost twenty years who choose to homeschool are motivated by their children. Home schoolers ask, ‘How can family centred learning be so appropriate at 4 years of age but inadequate at 6, 9 or even 15? How can decades of research into children’s brain and physical development have no impact on school practices?  Why do any parents today accept without question syllabus documents based on tradition and ritual rather than research and field testing? Homeschoolers are not ‘sheeples’. They have dared to be different – because each child is different.

Parents have a vested interest in the outcomes of their children’s education, more so than any distant bureaucrat or temporary politician. And while many homeschoolers struggle [and suffer] under a mediaeval and punitive bureaucracy in Queensland, they also benefit from the learning they experience hand in hand with their children. They model for their children the very freedom of choice our democracy needs to foster and support. Homeschoolers are parents and educators – and are often better read educators than those running our ‘schools’. And it is difficult today to be a well read educator and remain in the current school system.

Which really answers the questions – Why are so many parents leaving the school system? Because they are reading!!

o0o

Ken Woodful later extended this message and his comments are available here as an attachment. Highly recommended for those who wonder why the home-schooling movement is growing.

o0o

A Story re. ‘reading’. Ken to note. In the ‘old days’, I had the impression that school principals did not read much professional literature. I stated, at a meeting of principals,  that I thought that the best way to entice them to read more about their job, would be to put a centre-fold in all professional literature.  Guess what I was given to me just prior to retirement! Yep…an EOG – Education Office Gazette – with a comely centrefold included.  I treasure it…of course.

bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplan

If you have 4 minutes 17 seconds to spare from your busy schedule, click on the theme song “Care for Kids” above, relax and ‘take in’ the words. Meditate on the plight of today’s generation of Aussie kids.

OtherTreehorns ? :   Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Maintained by outstanding NZ educator, Allan Alach

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

We Catch More Flies With Sugar

The Treehorn Express

Treehorn story?  http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=11697

Theme song: ‘Care for Kids’

The Treehorn Express is dedicated to the cessation of Kleinist NAPLAN testing in Australia.  Our recently introduced Australian schooling system is based on one introduced to a New York school district by a lawyer, Joel Klein. in 2002 and copied by Australia’s Ms. Gillard in 2009, without consultation or examination. Mr Klein now heads the Murdoch test-publishing company worth billions. Australian test-freaks are amongst his disciples. Kleinism is a New York version of fear-driven schooling which separates ‘haves’ from ‘have nots’ and opens the door for mega-bank-rolling by known curriculum vandals for control of school-based learning. That’s why it exists.

It disrespects school pupils, devalues teachers’ professionalism, forces States to prescribe school texts and teaching strategies, threatens Australia’s future and rivals the Perth Mint as a money source for the top end of town. Why does Australia support it? Weird.

Come on folks. Get off the fence.Say something to somebody who might be able to help our kids.

Parents can stop the malignant practice by telling their school that they don’t want their children to contest NAPLAN.

Politicians can stop it if a few fair-dinkum Aussie ones stand up for Aussie kids in their Parliamentary Party Room.

Principals can stop it by refusing to have their professional ethics battered any more.

Teachers can stop it by saying ‘enough is enough’. We like our kids.

________But…Little Treehorn and his cobbers reckon that “Adults just don’t care about school kids.” ________

When Treehorn first started to shrink, he went to the doctor, quite agitated. He shouted at  the doctor, “Doctor, I’m shrinking.”

The doctor calmly responded, “Now, settle down, Treehorn. You just have to be a little patient.”

__________________________________________________________________________

We Catch More Flies with Sugar

Derek Hedgcock

Attached is an outstanding paper from an outstanding practitioner,known to many for his successful, innovative practices. It is eight pages long, hard to read on the fly [so to speak]. Dare I recommend that you print it out and, when you have the time, read it very carefully? It is quite outstanding, full of common sense.

It’s about the best child-supportive comment on NAPLAN that I have read. It signals some very important warnings as to the destiny of those unfortunate pupils who have to endure NAPLAN. They are our Australian kids, and Derek’s comments are telling.

Indeed, it presents some serious points of view that few of us have considered.

Click here to download the attachment.  We Catch More Flies with Sugar

_____________________________________________________________________________________

This n’That

NAPLAN for Politicians

The search for a name for the acronym NAPLAN 2013.. which refers to.the biggest schooling test ever for politicians, prior to the next federal elections, continues… with this response:-

“Because I believe there are two types of political force/farce behind the NAPLAN disaster…

Firstly, those who are naive and misled either through ignorance or apathy and I hear you ask what is the difference.

Secondly, those who are scheming and evil in their manipulative intent.

Therefore, I suggest two acronyms for NAPLAN that match these two categories respectively…

National Assessment of Politicians’ Lightsome Naivety.

National Assessment of Politicians’ Licentious Naziism.”

There is also..

National Assessment of Politicians’ Lassitude and Neglect.

National Assessment of Politicians’ Laziness and Nonchalance.

National Assessment of Politicians’ Liabilities and Negligence.

This means that we will, as a measure of accountability for our children’s happy and purposeful school learning, be assessing and sharing, with fellow voters, our local member’s [and all political parties’] neglect and laziness [ Do they say anything enlightening about the issues in their speeches and statements?], when it comes to getting rid of national blanket testing? Do they know the alternatives for effective evaluation of pupil progress. Are they so non-caring? Do they agree with totalitarian [Nazi-like] methods to ensure school compliance and teacher silence? OR What do they think of having an Australian child-loving, achievement oriented [sky’s the limit], love-learning, cooperative and equitable system? Can we learn from Finland and improve on its ideals ? Will our local member tell us about what’s so wrong with promoting respect for teachers; with training them and paying them well? Will they vote in their party meetings and in parliament for NAPLAN to be banned? OR Will they take the coward’s way and vote for its modification?

Will my member stand up for kids at the party meetings?

We can all look forward to the next 20 months of interesting teaching/learning dialogue. Right?

Any more suggestions? Did I miss some?

o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o

Derek Hedgcock [“We Catch More Flies with Sugar!” P.8] says : “NAPLAN is simply a compliance based, bullying approach to schooling.  As is universally the case with every instance of bullying, it reveals more about the fears of those who design, promote and support it [whether by direct action, sycophancy or by timid compliance] than it contributes to any form of worthy education, such as all our children deserve and need.

If we are to emerge into the unknown challenges of the future, we need, as best we can, to apply a combination of ancient wisdom with the emerging sciences of learning.

NAPLAN  does neither.”

________________________________________________________________

If you have another 4 minutes 17 seconds to spare from your busy schedule, click on the theme song “Care for Kids” above, relax and ‘take in’ the words. It’s quick meditation. Calm your anger. Enjoy.

Other Treehorns ? Check Recent Posts and Archives in the sidebar.

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point

Australia 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

Starting School 2012

The  Treehorn  Express

Who’s Treehorn?  http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?artlicle=11697

Australian school children will be returning to school soon. Some children will be starting school, with 12 or more years of institutionalised learning in front of them. If you know any of them, try to assess their enthusiasm for learning as they go through the first year. Take a real good look. It is well known that all children learn more in their first year of school than they do in any other year of their life.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could build on this natural enthusiasm and increase its spirit, year by year…instead of crippling it…as NAPLAN does ?

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if children left school with more enthusiasm for learning …lots more…than when they started? [What does an achievement level using numbers or letters mean to anyone who likes learning?]

The world would be everybody’s oyster if we had a system that looked at what happens in the classroom as children grew older; and we then constructed a learning culture through wise, experience leadership from what happens there. I’d suggest that Finland goes part of the way to develop this love for learning. At least, Finland doesn’t threaten its young nor prescribe what teachers must do.

I’d further suggest that Australia can do better than anyone else because we don’t have to copy systems from up-over, as we have been wont to do. We can be independent and better. We have real quality in our teaching force, at present….[even though some great talent have left with NAPLAN-disgust.]  It only needs conviction and grit; and exemplary leadership at the school level.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Please share this short story with as many parents and teachers as you can.

STARTING SCHOOL [1] – 2012

Louise wrote the following letter on 6 January, 2012.

Dear Phil,

Do I have the authority to refuse to allow my grade three daughter to sit the naplan test. As she fears this exam and has expressed such fear on several occasions to me. I am concerned for her future exam situations wherein the NAPLAN test may give her future exam anxiety that could cause long term damage. I think I know my child just as well as any teacher.

Does a note to the principal cover this or will I need to contact the education department directly?

We are currently in the public Queensland education system.

Louise.

I replied to Louise on the same day.

Dear Louise,

Thank you for your inquiry.

Yes. All you need to do is to write a polite letter to the Principal asking him or her “….to withdraw __Full Name __ from all NAPLAN testing while he/she is a pupil of the school.”

If your Principal is a curriculum-oriented person, as he/she probably is, your letter will be appreciated and understood. There should be no fuss.

It might be a courtesy just to tell the class teacher at some time or other that you have done this. This is not necessary, of course, but it ensures that pleasant and harmonious relationships prevail.

You are a very wise parent, for sure. I hope that you will get the chance to tell your friends what you have done.

Please  contact me direct by phone, email, whatever, should you wish to do so, Louise. I truly appreciate your question. Please feel free to use this letter in any way that you like.

Heartiest congratulations and warmest wishes.

Phil Cullen, Former Q’ld Director of Primary Education. 6 January 2012.

Louise forwarded an email on the following day.

Phil,

I had an interesting chat with my children’s principal today after receiving your email yesterday stating the ease with which one can remove the stress from their child regarding naplan. Most of my group of parent friends find it hard to believe that a government ordained exam is so easy to resolve for our children.

Louise. 7 January 2012

0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o

Also, on 7 January, Louise informed her friends on Facebook that all they had to do to withdraw from NAPLAN was to write to the Principal. Here’s some extracts from the replies.

A C : “So much pressure and I don’t understand what it achieves. When they bring it home I just say did you do your best.’yes’ has always been the answer. From there we put it away and get on with doing our best, not worrying what the piece of paper says”

RT: “I have never found it stressful with my children. Really a personal choice and opinion. Thanks.”

JS: “Funny how you don’t get told this. I have so many dramas with my kids over this test they get stressed and they also see how they COMPARE and I don’t like it an would rather them not do it. I ask the same thing did you do your best and I move on. The kids, however, do not. so yes I will be pulling mine out to save the drama and heart ache they get.”

RT: “If it causes the children stress it is not worth it. That’s why as parents we need to do the best for our children. All children are so different and some cope with things better than others.”

LM:”I feel it is so important parents know they don’t have to have their child sit the naplan if it does not suit that child. It is not advertised and many parents think that it’s just a part of life and the children must do it. This is simply not the case and each family has the right to decide for their own situation what is best for them. Spread the word it’s not just a must-do exam set by education Queensland.”

SM:” My daughter sat for hers..and she knew girls who actually cheated on it and got noticed for doing better than others. Was not fair at all.”

TT:”Thank you for the info my son is so stressed out by the test and the hype the teachers put on it he was sick, not to mention he had missed so much school due to the weather. HE WILL NOT BE DOING IT THIS YEAR.”

0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0

Isn’t it a pity that such fear and uncertainty about the administration of the silly blanket tests in May has spread through the general population?   It is just so simple to opt-out, as Louise and her friends have found.

Parental concern  would be removed if each school just mentioned on its website or on messages to parents that all that is required NOT TO CONTEST NAPLAN is a short note to the Principal.

Each Australian government authority really should make a public pronouncement ahead of the worries caused by the May tests.

Tell your school now. You can change your mind later if you think that NAPLAN might do your child [vis-a-vis the polliticians] any good. Ask yourself. Where’s the benefit to my kid?

It is not a secret.  Better still, a curriculum oriented school will have a typed statement, ready for signature when each child is enrolled.

No big problem…..unless the school or state department has something to hide!

———————————————————————————————————————

The present-day bipartisan political  focus on CONFORMITY, INEQUALITY and MEDIOCRITY – forced on us by government decree  – through the regimentation of our young by the use of NAPLAN – with all-party support– is NOT the Australian way.

WE MAINTAIN THIS TOTALITARIAN EDUCATION BY OUR SILENCE.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Remember

About September, 2013 there will be  Australian politicians’  NAPLAN DAY :-

National Assessment of Politicians’ L…………….. And N…………….  Can you help to fill the blanks?

Lassitude and Neglect ?        Laziness  and  Nonchalance ?

David Buckle suggest National Assessment of Politicians’ Liabilities and Negligence.

bannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplanbannaplan

Phil Cullen

41 Cominan Avenue

Banora Point 2486

07 5524 6443

cphilcullen@bigpond.com

http://primaryschooling.net

Dear Julia & Peter

 The Treehorn Express 

Treehorn story? http://primaryschooling.net?page_id=1924

Theme Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQj-6F7yPM8

The Treehorn Express is dedicated to the cessation of Kleinist NAPLAN testing in Australia.  Kleinism is a New York version of fear-driven schooling which uses the blanket-testing ‘wmd’ called NAPLAN [its only learning-motivational weapon] to destroy the  reputation of teachers and schools. This weapon was forced on schools in Australia in 2009. It separates ‘haves’ from ‘have nots’ and opens the door for mega-bank-rolling by known curriculum vandals for control of school-based learning. It disrespects school pupils, devalues teachers’ professionalism, threatens Australia’s developmental future and is just no good.  Politely described, it stinks.

Although some ‘education’ groups support it, ideologically, NAPLAN is immoral, unprofessional, politically driven, unrequested by the profession, curriculum destructive, extremely costly, wasteful and divisive. It has a background of malicious intent. 

IT WILL REMAIN UNTIL ENOUGH GOOD PEOPLE SAY “STOP IT”

For further information, click on the official description http://www.nap.edu.au/information/FAQs/index.html  Get it?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Julia and Peter,

“I’m sure you’re familiar with the work of the late Douglas McGregor, but a reminder may help. His 1960 book The Human Side of Management is considered one of the most influential books on management principles ever written.  In it, he describes two very different assumptions about human nature, labels them “Theory X” and “Theory Y”, and discusses their implications and ramifications for productivity.

Theory X managers, he said, assume that most people dislike work, avoid it if possible, tend to be irresponsible, and need tight controls in the form of penalties and rewards to keep them from deviating from organizational goals.

Theory Y managers assume that work is natural, satisfying, and rewarding, and that if organizational goals are clear and acceptable, most people, given sufficient authority, will take the initiative, seek responsibility, and bring imagination, creativity, and ingenuity to their work.

Read two two paragraphs again, please, substituting the word ‘learning’ for ‘work’.

McGregor says that people who are managed in accordance with either theory tend to develop behaviour that matches the theory. You know a lot about feedback loops. Give some serious thought to that one, and its implications for, say, performance gaps and school discipline problems.

The educators I think that you want and surely need on your side are those who know from years of firsthand classroom experience the costs and limitations of Theory X and the productive potential of Theory Y. But instead of enlisting them, the reform efforts you’ve been promoting and the promotional strategies you’ve used, drive them up the wall.

*Corporate and banker control, NAPLAN, teacher control, punishments and rewards, standardised pupil expectations, emphasis on scores instead of content, bribery of state ministers and departments, public naming and shaming, emphasis on scores in tests, sweet-talking control of teacher groups and principals. These are your contributions to Australian schooling.

Every single one of these is straight, undiluted Theory X

Theory X has brought public schooling to crisis. Theory X will eventually destroy it.”

“””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””’
No. I  didn’t compose this letter nor send it, but I altered the para marked with the asterisk for Australian conditions.
It was extracted from a letter that Marion Brady sent to Bill Gates, through Valerie Strauss’s column in the Washington Post. I hope Marion doesn’t mind. It’s a great article:-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/how-bill-gates-can-be-an-education-hero/2011/11/16/gIQAYWGrSN_blog.html#pagebreak

Do you think that the number of true believers in Theory X is growing?  Some Principals’ groups do, Mr. Klein does, some hard-line schoolies do, the military does, some parents.  Maybe more? Do you? Please think about it.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
The Courier Mail, Friday Nov. 18 featured [Page 2] a Queensland State School where some parents are objecting to having to pay $24.95 for Excel Year 7 NAPLAN Style Tests. They don’t seem to realise the importance that the school places on raising the test scores next May and that plenty of practice is required. Content. Content. Content.
This raises some interesting issues. If a parent objects to her child doing the NAPLAN tests and informs the Principal that she does not want her child to participate, is she still obliged to purchase the book and allow her child to spend school time doing the practice tests? Can she insist on the full curriculum being taught during March-April-May, including the days that the NAPLAN tests are contested? Who will teach them during practice time and test time?
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Other Treehorns ? : Check Recent Posts and Archives in Sidebar.  

Phil Cullen
41 Cominan Avenue
Banora Point
Australia 2486
07 5524 6443
cphilcullen@bigpond.com
http://primaryschooling.net